Skip to main content

I Name Them Like Goodall

My mother-in-law died Wednesday.  Thursday, there was a viewing.  The funeral was today, Friday.  The viewing lasted 9 hours, and my wife and I were there the whole time.  I met many people I may never see again and almost certainly won't remember.  I was able to spend some time with my niece and nephew.  I took a Klonopin, and I think it might have helped me with my anxiety.  With the exception of my Trazodone, I'm not very good at telling whether or not my meds are working.
I have no feelings about the experience.  I wasn't close to my mother-in-law.  I'm not sad about her death.  I know that other people are, and I'm sensitive to that.  I find that the best way to be the most helpful is just to stay out of the way of peoples' sorrow.  It rolls along no matter what.  I express sympathy by agreeing with people and saying that I understand.  I do.  It's not pretense.  I have sympathy.  I genuinely care about people.  I just can't draw the lines of my care.

I don't have very deep emotions.  My feelings can reach a level of intensity, but they generally don't last very long.  Trying to think about how my feelings work is difficult and I often come up with nothing.  I'm not stoic, though I can appear so.  I'm just mostly flat.

At the visitation, I went to my mother-in-law in her casket.  I touched her hand and thought about how she used to play piano.  I looked closely at her face and tried to remember it moving.  I didn't experience any feelings.  I thought about how we define the self and the things we imagine about souls, spirits, or similar vital energies that may survive death.  Considering the corpse in the box left me with no stronger emotions than those I feel when I do the dishes or look through Netflix for something to watch.  I wonder what it'll be like when my dad dies.  Will I suddenly understand why everyone else, seeing Fern lying dead in nice clothes, was somehow existentially moved?

I try to help my wife.  She's sad now.  I want to make her sadness go away.  I care about her and I want her to be happy.  Also, sad people annoy me.  I don't like that about myself, but it's there. Other people go about their lives under glass.  I'm on the outside looking in.  Their important things seem small to me.  Their normal sorrows seem unnecessary.  Perhaps Jane Goodall is a better example.  I understand the apes. I make good guesses about them.  I've lived with them my whole life.  Still, no matter how much I understand about ape society and how much I care for their happiness and wellbeing - no matter how like them I am - at end of the day I am simply not the same kind of ape.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...

How to Save the World

The following isn't related to autism.  It's an edited transcript of my side of a conversation with an AI.  I'm including it here because I think it's important. It should be pretty easy to arrive at the notion that, if we want to minimize our environmental impact, we should look back at a time when we were making a minimal impact and return to that. But that is not a suggestion anyone is making, and I don't think it's a suggestion anyone is likely to make, wherever these conversations are being had.  The conversation about conservation always begins with the tacit question, "How can we continue breeding unchecked forever, and how can we continue to deplete natural resources indefinitely?"  If you start from the idea that what we are doing now must not be impacted by whatever solution we come up with, then you're not going to come up with a good solution. This issue seems complex.  I don't think it's actually complex at all, however. I thin...