Skip to main content

The Machine With No Ghost

What is it like to have an autism spectrum disorder?

I don't experience catharsis.  Even recreation is a matter of intense focus.  I focus and then the focus is gone and I'm done until I focus on something else.  It all lasts like a burning match.  I don't experience things for very long.  Feelings appear before me and are gone.  There is sadness in my life, but it's like music from across the street.  Sometimes I definitely hear it.  Sometimes I'm not sure if I hear it.  And sometimes I don't hear it at all.  Whatever the case, it's always distant and doesn't distract me for long.  Even huge and immediate sadness.  I move between experiences like a robot being controlled remotely.  I feel things and then I don't feel them.  I forget.  Catharsis seems pointless.

I enjoy things.  I'm happy and I'm sad.  But nothing capsizes me.  Good things, bad things, and things that are neutral are all the same in that they occur and then they stop occurring.  Valence is projected, imposed upon experiences.  I can't be fully immersed no matter what I do.  Something stops me.  The images keep changing, and I'm too busy wondering what the next one is going to be.

Life is looking at images.  See a picture, have a reaction, then go home.  I don't live in the reaction.  I don't live anywhere.  I'm not trapped in the images or in my experience of seeing them because they aren't anything.  There is a vantage point from which even the worst things are just little lights.  There they are, dancing.  That's all they do.  There's nothing else.  There is a vantage point from which nothing that happens anywhere seems to be happening at all.

I'm not surprised that things happen.  I'm not surprised that I react.  Feelings aren't new.  They're part of the only experience we can have.  Every person only gets one experience for their entire lives: the human experience.  You want, you try, you grieve, you celebrate, and you worry.  That's it forever.  I'm part of it, but I'm not wowed.  I'm not having a beautiful and unique experience.  I'm having the same one every H. sapiens has had since our advent 100,000 years ago.  I expect things to happen.  I expect to react, and that I should move from my reaction to the only place there is to go: to the next occurrence and the next reaction.  Should I be moved by all this?  Is the human experience miraculous simply because it occurs?  Is it more reasonable to expect it not to occur?  It's monotonous, and I sometimes feel bitter that we don't get anything more in our lives than to move from feeling to feeling within a limited range.

This is high-functioning autism: I am like a machine.  Machines don't need catharsis.  Machines do the only things they can do until they stop.  There's no philosophy here.  I want to make it clear that I'm not talking about my opinion.  I'm describing myself in essence - in the only way I can be.  This is what it's like to be me, and I hope that's understood here.  I didn't emerge from contemplation and resolve to be dispassionate.  This is just the way I am.  When I look into myself, I just see a person.  It's not good or bad.  It is - it all is.  There is nothing that isn't.

So I don't escape.  There's nowhere to go.  Even numbness is something to consider.  I'm not waiting for anything.  I'm just having experiences and then not having them.  I do make value judgements but then I don't care about the value judgments or I forget them and the experiences they judge.
OK here is the end:
I don't experience catharsis because I have a malformed inner life and because all my emotions are ephemeral.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...

How to Save the World

The following isn't related to autism.  It's an edited transcript of my side of a conversation with an AI.  I'm including it here because I think it's important. It should be pretty easy to arrive at the notion that, if we want to minimize our environmental impact, we should look back at a time when we were making a minimal impact and return to that. But that is not a suggestion anyone is making, and I don't think it's a suggestion anyone is likely to make, wherever these conversations are being had.  The conversation about conservation always begins with the tacit question, "How can we continue breeding unchecked forever, and how can we continue to deplete natural resources indefinitely?"  If you start from the idea that what we are doing now must not be impacted by whatever solution we come up with, then you're not going to come up with a good solution. This issue seems complex.  I don't think it's actually complex at all, however. I thin...