Skip to main content

Life Without Self in The World Beyond Culture

I think about my identity.  Sexuality, gender, race.  What does any description of my experience of selfhood amount to?  What defines me?  What bricks are in the wall of who I am?

It seems to be important to many people that they be able to identify themselves with or as something and that they present to others pieces in their daily lives that are probative of a gestalt self-definition.  I am fascinated by philosophical explorations of personal identity and I've thought about myself in this context for a long time.  But I've never been able to muster any enthusiasm for the idea of arriving at one stable self-definition.  I don't care who I am, or even if I am definitely anyone.  This is an innate disinterest.  I'm not talking about self-annihilation here.  I'm describing weak propriate agnosticism.  I don't care what I mean by me or what relation I bear only to myself.

I trust my senses as much as I must to get anything done. I am certain enough that I am not anyone else to avoid being mired in Cartesian angst.  That much is sufficient to resolve any personal identity crises.  I identify as myself and it isn't in me to care to explain.  Furthermore I'm not concerned with what anyone thinks about that because I don't think the issue at large is important enough to argue about.  If pressed, I'd say that I believe the self to be a dynamic illusion.  But that opinion isn't valuable to me.

At some point I began noticing other people's concerns.  Considering them left me disappointed and I remain so. The world others expect me to care about seems petty.  I don't want the things that are all other people's lives are to be all that my life is.  Work, money, politics, the hills we die on.  We obscure so much beauty.  I see a different world.  Not a better world necessarily but a bigger one.  The Other World.  The world that isn't about what we are doing.  I've always seen it.  The nightmare of humanity amid the dream of everything else.

So I don't care to define myself.  I never have, but I tried to for a long time because I thought I had to or I'd be exiled.  I have always been an outsider but I spent most of my life until now trying to get in, even to the detriment of my wellbeing, thinking that embracing others' narrow view of the ordinary was the only option.  But I'm not doing that anymore.  I'm not concerned with fitting under a label.  That concept is part of the world I don't want to be in.  That finite world of nonetheless infinite work and suffering in strife against each other.  If I must say what I am, I am the opposite of that. But that's the world of ordinary people and rejecting it means rejecting them.  My limited emotional depth and lack of motivation to bond facilitate that.  So I am now exploring more consciously than ever the isolation that comes from living beyond culture.  And I'm not finding it lonely or sad but instead I'm enjoying being what I've genuinely always thought it was only natural for anyone to be: nothing and no one for sure and forever.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...

How to Save the World

The following isn't related to autism.  It's an edited transcript of my side of a conversation with an AI.  I'm including it here because I think it's important. It should be pretty easy to arrive at the notion that, if we want to minimize our environmental impact, we should look back at a time when we were making a minimal impact and return to that. But that is not a suggestion anyone is making, and I don't think it's a suggestion anyone is likely to make, wherever these conversations are being had.  The conversation about conservation always begins with the tacit question, "How can we continue breeding unchecked forever, and how can we continue to deplete natural resources indefinitely?"  If you start from the idea that what we are doing now must not be impacted by whatever solution we come up with, then you're not going to come up with a good solution. This issue seems complex.  I don't think it's actually complex at all, however. I thin...