Skip to main content

Am I Satisfied With Myself?

In an episode of Parts Unknown, Anthony Bourdain asks a group of young women about their hopes and dreams.  One of them begins to answer by saying, "I want to be satisfied with myself."

Am I satisfied with myself?  I'm not sure I know what that means.  I'm thinking about it literally.  If I am in a position to evaluate myself, then whatever of me is doing the evaluating could also be evaluated.  If I decide that I am dissatisfied with myself, then I could also be dissatisfied with being dissatisfied and decide upon reevaluation that I am satisfied after all.  Perhaps I might be dissatisfied with my inability to evaluate myself as satisfactory.  What part of me evaluates me but is not identical to the part that is being evaluated?

The idea falls apart.  I overthink it because I don't understand it.  It becomes too heavy and collapses.  I am bad at understanding this kind of language.  I don't know what myself definitely is.  I don't have impressive experiences of self.  Other people are mysteries to me too.  How do they experience self evaluation?  I don't know how they think about themselves or others.  That piece doesn't fit in my puzzle.

I am of course capable of reflecting on my actions.  I can practice and learn and recognize patterns.  But I don't evaluate myself the way I might evaluate an object or a situation.  There are many objects and situations, but I am all that I have to work with.  I don't know what there is to be satisfied or dissatisfied about.  My evaluations emerge from me and I constitute myself.  Basically I don't understand.  I think about it and become confused.

"Be true to yourself" is another thing one might hear.  I don't know what this means either.  I have trouble with it.  Is it meant to be figurative?  I think it probably means something more than "Be honest about what you're doing" or "Don't lie about your identity."  But I'm not sure.  I can't imagine a situation in which I would  be at odds with myself.  Furthermore, I'm not certain it is so useful as to be crucial that I work to remain a clear and distinct entity.  That seems to happen on its own.

I am capable of self assessment.  I can consider how I feel.  And I can talk about my intentions and behavior.  I don't hurt people deliberately.  Instead I want to help.  I'm not at all concerned with how others conduct their lives.  I think that I am probably a good person.  But that doesn't feel like exactly what people mean when they say that they hope to be satisfied with themselves.  Or maybe it is.  I genuinely don't know.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Save the World

The following isn't related to autism.  It's an edited transcript of my side of a conversation with an AI.  I'm including it here because I think it's important. It should be pretty easy to arrive at the notion that, if we want to minimize our environmental impact, we should look back at a time when we were making a minimal impact and return to that. But that is not a suggestion anyone is making, and I don't think it's a suggestion anyone is likely to make, wherever these conversations are being had.  The conversation about conservation always begins with the tacit question, "How can we continue breeding unchecked forever, and how can we continue to deplete natural resources indefinitely?"  If you start from the idea that what we are doing now must not be impacted by whatever solution we come up with, then you're not going to come up with a good solution. This issue seems complex.  I don't think it's actually complex at all, however. I thin...
Post a Comment
Read more