Skip to main content

How Not To Build A Hug: A Blog Post About Getting Lame Advice

My books do not sell.  I ended my professional relationship with my publisher and resolved to retire as an author.  My therapist was unhappy that I had decided to quit and suggested that I contact the Autism Society of Indiana as well as animal rights advocate and autism spokesperson Dr. Temple Grandin.  He said I should ask for help promoting myself.  Maybe I could send Dr. Grandin a book.  Though I thought there was little point in doing so, I did as he suggested.  I sent messages to these two entities via their websites.

I got an email from Dr. Grandin's people.  It said I could call her at a certain number and that she would return my call.  I don't like talking to strangers on the phone but I called anyway and spoke to someone who was not Dr. Grandin.  I told this person why I was calling and that I was uncomfortable speaking on the phone.  He said Dr. Grandin would email me.  She called me instead.

I was very nervous. I paced through my apartment while I told her why I was calling.  I didn't know how to promote myself.  I was socially incompetent and I couldn't interact with people in meaningful ways, so I couldn't inspire them to buy my books.  She told me I should go online and promote my books in fora and writing groups.  I had done this, but I didn't say so.  Calling me forced me to improvise.  I didn't have time to compose my thoughts or to screw up my courage.  I could only listen to Dr. Grandin describe things she had done, successes she had enjoyed.  She talked about cold calling meat packing plants and walking up to editors and getting their cards.  She suggested that I watch other people socialize online and imitate what they did.  I didn't tell her that I'm incapable of imitating complex social behaviors.  I can do the same things others do, but I can't generate novel iterations of those things.  I don't have that skill.  Apparently, Dr. Grandin does.  My autism comes with profound social disability.  It seems that hers does not.  She is autistic, too, but we are not each other.

My books are works of fiction in the fantasy genre.  Dr. Grandin explained that she wasn't "a fantasy person," and she suggested that I change the title of my most recent book, The Gardens Arcane.  
"Will fantasy readers know what that means?" she asked.
I told her they would.  She said that I should add a subtitle that included the word "fantasy."  I didn't tell her that no fantasy author in their right mind would do that.
(I wonder how Dr. Grandin would have advised Professor Tolkien regarding the title of The Silmarillion or Brian Jacques about Salamandstron.)

Dr. Grandin also instructed me to "leave the autism out of it" when I talked to people about my books.  If I told people I was autistic, they might treat me differently, she said.   I am not going to take that advice.  I joined a writing forum after I got off the phone.  I wanted to be proactive even though I didn't like what Dr. Grandin had had to say.  In my first post on the forum, I disclosed that I was autistic and nervous about interacting with other members.  I only know how to be who I am.

At the end of the call, she told me to call her in a month and tell her how things were going. I won't be doing that.  The advice Dr. Grandin gave me is frustratingly familiar: pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, call the company and ask for the manager's direct line, all it takes is gumption.  This is naive, and it presumes that I've made no efforts on my own.  It's possible that Dr. Grandin was as ignorant of how she came across as she was of what useful advice would have sounded like.  

In closing, I want to say this: interacting with a group of strangers isn't as simple as jumping in and joining their discussion as a full equal.  That isn't how humans build groups.  There are rules, games, expectations, traditions, politics.  There are cliques, and trends.  There is favoritism.  And so much of this is unspoken.  The way my autism manifests, I can't integrate into group cultures.  I know this from decades of experience, the bewildering loneliness of my childhood and teenage years, being told that I was just like everyone else but lazier, twenty years of youth and twenty years of adulthood, growing into myself, learning my limitations.  I know what I can do.

Temple Grandin has had a movie made about her life.  She may be a hero in the autism community, but she doesn't know me.  The advice she gave me was actually for her.  My conversation with her was a waste of time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...

How to Save the World

The following isn't related to autism.  It's an edited transcript of my side of a conversation with an AI.  I'm including it here because I think it's important. It should be pretty easy to arrive at the notion that, if we want to minimize our environmental impact, we should look back at a time when we were making a minimal impact and return to that. But that is not a suggestion anyone is making, and I don't think it's a suggestion anyone is likely to make, wherever these conversations are being had.  The conversation about conservation always begins with the tacit question, "How can we continue breeding unchecked forever, and how can we continue to deplete natural resources indefinitely?"  If you start from the idea that what we are doing now must not be impacted by whatever solution we come up with, then you're not going to come up with a good solution. This issue seems complex.  I don't think it's actually complex at all, however. I thin...