Skip to main content

Talking in the Dark

I can't let myself forget to blog!  Ugh.  OK.  Here goes another entry.

I almost never ask rhetorical questions.  I don't think to ask them.  When others ask them, I get upset.  I can usually tell when a question is rhetorical, but I can't usually see exactly what I'm supposed to infer from it.  I'm not very good at making those kinds of inferences.  I also don't see the point of rhetorical questions most of the time.  Or I feel that they are asked pointlessly by people who don't have a firm grasp on what rhetoric is.

It's a much better idea to be direct when speaking with me.  I will understand you better if you get right to what you're trying to say.   If you try to make me infer what you mean, I will probably make the wrong inference, and I will get upset that you don't just say it.  I assume, by default, that people avoid directness for a reason.  I further assume that reason is nefarious.  They're trying to mislead me, manipulate me.  This is a sign of disrespect.  They would be direct if they saw me as an equal.  This is just how I think.  These are the wrong inferences that I make.

The way in which I misunderstand people and misinterpret their motives is colored by bad trauma.  I have been around very manipulative people.  Abuse has taught me to expect abuse.  It upsets me when I think someone is trying to put an idea that is theirs into my head inside a kind of Trojan horse, intending to make me believe that the idea is my own.  Using movie vernacular, you could call this inception.  I see this as naught but insidious.  I have been victimized by some bad people, and that has impacted the way I listen to and interpret others.  It's made me suspicious and hypervigilant for manipulation.

A certain amount of manipulation is normal, apparently.  Conveying an idea through speech isn't as simple as tranaparently explaining it in full detail.  There are always politics involved.  Emotional politics.  Said politics are beyond my ability to grasp, let alone play, most of the time.  I know about them though, and that's like walking through pitch darkness knowing there's a staircase somewhere.  You proceed carefully with the staircase constantly on your mind, searching for it with your foot, expecting everything to be that first step's perilous dropoff.  Staircases are helpful and normal, but they become scary when you're blind and you don't know the room.  This is what trying to communicate through Asperger's is like - at least for me.  Every conversation is an unfamiliar room full of invisible dangers that I can't stop looking for, and I'm often wrong when I think I've found one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

George Versus Lennie

People seem to believe that you can't have cognitive deficits if you don't seem stupid. The image many carry in their minds of a person with cognitive problems is an image of someone whose internal dysfunction necessarily finds clear outward manifestation in unusual physical proportions, motor skills, vocal quality, and speech patterns. Less objectively, it's an image of a cartoon idiot: Lennie from Of Mice and Men as depicted in Looney Tun es .  This is a suboptimal situation.  My autism involves some cognitive impairment. Because I'm intelligent and articulate, even paraprofessionals have trouble remembering or, in fact, believing that I'm not as able to apply my intellect as ordinary people are. I'm smart, I'm not Lennie, but I'm not George either. The dichotomy between those characters is the only way many people can understand the difference between neurotypical people and people with cognitive or neurodevelopmental disabilities. If I'm n...