Skip to main content

Fonzie's Jukebox



Looking into other people and seeing them exactly how they are is confounding because either I can't see anything recognizable or I see something that is alien and disturbing.
An interaction.  Names changed.
Me: Plover says the gathering is at his and Sparrow's place.
Finch: Their place?
Me: Yes.  How do you feel about that?
Finch: I don't have any definite feeling about that.
Me: I heard you say "Their place?" And I thought you meant "It's bad that the gathering is at their place."  And then I heard you say that you had no definite feeling about that and I thought you meant that you do have a definite feeling about that.
Finch: Well I just think it's funny that Plover would call Sparrow's place his place too when he just got back in town from months abroad and may not even be staying permanently.
Me: I'm confused because you didn't offer that opinion at first and it seemed to me that I had to coax it out of you.  What does that mean?
Finch: I just hadn't fully formed that thought yet and then it finally formed when you prompted me with questions.
Me: I am confused by that.
Finch: Unrelated thoughts about errands distracted me from my assessment of how I felt about Plover calling Sparrow's house his own but your questions restored my focus on the conversation.

I have experienced this before.  I call it Fonzie's Jukebox.  On the show Happy Days, the character Fonzie would often knock a jukebox with his fist to get it to work.  Sometimes it seems that people need a cognitive bump to get their thoughts going.  A prompt from another person to motivate them to complete a thought.  Not a sentence necessarily but a cognitive event.  Reputedly, this is common.  It isn't common to me; my cognitive processes move to completion on their own unless I am interrupted.  Prompting me is unnecessary and will derail my train of thought.  So it's very difficult to accept that other people might have thoughts which get stopped as they form, which trip on their other thoughts, or which form sluggishly without a nudge.  Hearing this is like hearing that it is common for people to need to see the color puce before they can turn left.  The idea is totally alien, totally strange.  And considering it leaves me feeling confused and dismayed.  Finch's plight may seem easy for others to understand.  Others who have experienced themselves what happened to Finch in this particular situation.  But not me.  I am confused enough and dismayed enough by what happens in other people's minds in general that I cannot conduct normal relationships.  How do I know when someone is being evasive, when someone needs a Fonzie knock to get their thoughts going again, or when they simply have nothing more to say?  I face daily minds that are entirely alien to me such that I can never find my footing to socialize and I am preoccupied with the problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

The Meadow

 There is a cascade of questions: how can I live a good life? What is the value of goodness? What is the essence of value? We might assess our lives as either good or bad. We might say that good is better than bad, and that we should be good because being bad is the only alternative. But surely being neither good nor bad is an option. It must be possible to observe without assessing. This is what I want. I want to leave nothing in the world. Some will say that neutrality is simply in the bad category, and that we must want to live positive lives.  Let them say so, and let them condemn me if I live a life of non-participation. I have no interest in politics or society. I have no interest in justice or the common good. To some, saying this is the same as saying that I'm bad or that I'm at best contributing to the bad. Is appeasing critics to be my sole motivation for engaging with this evaluating system? Perhaps I should want to make the world better. But I don't believe ...