Skip to main content

I Am An Edifice

I don't seek or collect experiences.  My life isn't episodic.  I'm not living a story.  I'm an edifice.  I stand in the elements and am affected and continue standing.  It's not an effort of will.  I am just a wall.

This is in contrast to how I imagine others live.  How they consider their experiences, how they think about the content and character of the things that happen to them.  How they describe the arcs of their lives.  But maybe I'm wrong about that. I can only guess what other people's lives are like.

I have no arc.  Or I am unconcerned with mine if I do have one.  Experiences flash and then dissipate.  I'm not interested in their memories.  Or in my life's posterity.  I let experiences happen and I do nothing most of the time.  Processing is no task since I am as well off if I decide not to do so as I might be otherwise .  Does this make sense?  I fear that it doesn't.

If it doesn't it's because I don't know how to compare what my life is like to what someone else's life is like.  I don't think about what my life is like in that way.  But I see a difference.  It seems that other people conduct their lives differently and that they process their experiences differently.  But I don't know how to explain what's different.  This is the best illustration I've devised: my experience of self is smooth and airy while those of others are weighty and convoluted.  Theirs are rich whilw mine's impoverished, but I'm ok with that.  I'm generally not plagued by concerns like small importance, semiotic significance, spiritual meaning, or emotional weight.  I'm not caught in the web of trying to be part of things.  I am not active.  I am reactive.

I'm just something that sticks up from the ground.  You might lean on me.  If I'm reliable it's incidental.  I keep my complexity to myself because it's not for anyone else.  My life isn't for anyone but me.  It isn't vivid and passionate.  I'm not desperately alive, living for new stimuli.  I am instead mostly instimulable.  A rock.  An island.  Happily unimportant in my own story.

If others want stimulation, I am not like them.  If they need to have experiences, then I'm different.  If they are active in moving the plots of their lives forward, then I'm set apart.  But I don't know people. I don't have any idea how others exist in the world.  I can only say for myself that I am small and quiet and I live a vaporous life that I am happy with.  I am not complex and other people seem to be.  I don't know what this opinion amounts to.  I will summate now:  it seems to me that other people are far more invested in the nature of their own experiences than I am, that they clutch for significance therein while I see none, and this makes me feel confused.  In general, I am confused about people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

The Meadow

 There is a cascade of questions: how can I live a good life? What is the value of goodness? What is the essence of value? We might assess our lives as either good or bad. We might say that good is better than bad, and that we should be good because being bad is the only alternative. But surely being neither good nor bad is an option. It must be possible to observe without assessing. This is what I want. I want to leave nothing in the world. Some will say that neutrality is simply in the bad category, and that we must want to live positive lives.  Let them say so, and let them condemn me if I live a life of non-participation. I have no interest in politics or society. I have no interest in justice or the common good. To some, saying this is the same as saying that I'm bad or that I'm at best contributing to the bad. Is appeasing critics to be my sole motivation for engaging with this evaluating system? Perhaps I should want to make the world better. But I don't believe ...