Skip to main content

I'm Not Finished

There are articles about how Edward Scissorhands can relate to autism spectrum disorder.  This isn't one of them.

I watch casual interactions.  I don't know how people decide what to say when making small talk.  I don't know what to say myself.  And I don't know what people expect.  Trying to conduct a casual conversation is for me like being colorblind and trying to solve a Rubik's cube.  I can only guess.  I err on the side of politeness and that usually works all right.  Somebody told me I should ask people about themselves so I try to do that.  I have a short list of things to say in any given situation.  Like a dialogue tree in a video game.  Is this what it's like for other people?  I don't know.

The video game analogy might not be relatable to everyone but I think it's good.  Video games are limited by their scripts, even those that give the player a lot of freedom.  The play experience happens within clear boundaries and there are only so many ways the player can improvise.  I'm comfortable with this because I'm bad at improvising and I don't want to do it.  Though I enjoy freedom, I want within a free space a limited and focused experience.  This I can cope with.  But real life isn't scripted and there's no plot.  The real world isn't try to do anything.  Moments are blank and we stain them with intent and feeling.  In no framework, I have to improvise, and I become overwhelmed.  I need the focus of a plot.  At least in conversation.

I am analytical.  Analyzing is all I can do.  It's the one trick I know and I apply analysis to every situation.  I expect social interaction to be universally a matter of computation.  When it isn't I'm left staring paralyzed.  And it seems often that it's not, but I don't know.  I make no claims to certainty but it seems to me that people are seldom understandable by pure calculation alone.  They say things they don't exactly mean, they say the opposite of what they mean, or they hide what they mean as a matter of ritual.  Socializing could be straightforward but games and posturing complicate it.  One must know the signs but I can't.  I am analytical, but I have limited avenues of analysis.  And I feel the limits terribly.

But others report that I do fine.  It could be that I don't know what it looks like for me to do fine in a social interaction.  My intelligence is like a prototype artificial intelligence a few iterations distant from being able to pass as fully human.  And I imagine those iterations could be said to represent stages of neurological development.  In three words, the aforementioned homunculus summates this whole piece and my feelings about myself: "I'm not finished."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

Threat and Opportunity

Humans see everything as either a threat or an opportunity. These are the only classifications they have. A threat could be a corporal threat, like a violent person, or it could be a threat to their attention, like a boring person or a waste of time.   You're not in control of whether something looks like a threat or an opportunity. You can certainly apply control to turn one into the other, but your first impressions of anything are unconscious. I'm a waste of time. There's nothing to be gained from socializing with me because I'm profoundly socially impaired. I have no status and no way to earn status, so I'm a threat to attention. People who choose to pay attention to me find the endeavor prohibitively expensive of their energy. Attending to me is necessarily a struggle against the Darwinian impulse to conserve energy.  We can call this a rejection response.   I've said that humans naturally have a psychological allergy to me, but that's not a good...

The Human Protocol

Humanity is a spectrum. Some people move through human society without ever belonging in it. I'm such a person. Every thought, every emotion, every sensation, everything your internal organs do, your balance, your muscle tone, your proprioception, every experience you have, from the big ones to the little ones, corresponds to something that happens in your brain: a neural event. Most neural events are beyond our direct control. Every neural event has a trigger. Someone says your name and you turn. You like a song, so you turn it up. What triggers neural events is determined by things like your genes, your upbringing, your culture, and your values. Many neural events are reserved for human-to-human interactions. If you encountered a mosquito that spoke English, you'd recategorize it, and you might change the way you went about trying to keep it from biting you. It would qualify for a kind of consideration that we don't usually offer mosquitoes. It would be more than just an ...