Skip to main content

The Teflon Artist

Being asocial, I am not motivated to socialize.  Being autistic, as is my specific experience of autism, I am socially inept.  I am, to the detriment of my interpersonal communication skills, disproportionately more analytical than emotive. 

Dispassion is often unwelcome in the interpersonal world, even when it is appropriate.  I'm uncomfortable with passion because it is unreliable.  What passion I do have is inclined toward neutral description, so it little seems like passion at all. 

This is a portrait of disability.  I am narrow and reticent.  This certainly isn't conducive to lucrative success in the arts.  Because I fail to connect when I do attempt to interact, I escape the notice of people who might help me in my profession.  Furthermore, my art is very analytical, being especially inclined toward philosophical explorations of nihility.  The emotion it contains may seem sterile or cold.  So I may fail to connect on two levels.

This is conjecture about why I have failed as an artist.  I don't myself know well enough what connecting successfully feels like to say with certainty how often I fail to do it.  To put it another way: I wouldn't know a successful interpersonal interaction if it jumped up and bit me.  I needs must trust reports of my seeming stoic and disengaged and of my art failing to resonate emotionally.  This doesn't mean I consider myself a failure, but it is a significant frustration. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

The Meadow

 There is a cascade of questions: how can I live a good life? What is the value of goodness? What is the essence of value? We might assess our lives as either good or bad. We might say that good is better than bad, and that we should be good because being bad is the only alternative. But surely being neither good nor bad is an option. It must be possible to observe without assessing. This is what I want. I want to leave nothing in the world. Some will say that neutrality is simply in the bad category, and that we must want to live positive lives.  Let them say so, and let them condemn me if I live a life of non-participation. I have no interest in politics or society. I have no interest in justice or the common good. To some, saying this is the same as saying that I'm bad or that I'm at best contributing to the bad. Is appeasing critics to be my sole motivation for engaging with this evaluating system? Perhaps I should want to make the world better. But I don't believe ...