Skip to main content

Fundamental Incompatibility

I don't identify as human.  Many autistic people report feeling as though they were born on the wrong planet.  I take this as metaphor.   When I say that I'm not human, I mean that literally.

Modern humans are a subspecies of Homo sapiens called Homo sapiens sapiens.  I believe I am distinct enough from H. sapiens sapiens to consider myself an inhuman person.  I outlined some reasons for this in the previous blog post (Am I Human?).  Here is another reason.

Humans flip switches in each other.  This is a reductive way to describe a series of complex neurological processes.  When you hear your name or see a human face, something happens in your brain: a switch is flipped (so to speak) that causes your thought and behavior to change tracks.  Hearing your name changes how you focus your attention.  Seeing your friend in a crowd changes your behavior.  For the most part, you aren't in charge of how these switches act.  Their actions and effects are subconscious.  But some switches can be flipped consciously.

I don't trigger the same switches in humans that humans trigger in each other.  For instance, I don't trigger the attention switch.  When I'm talking with a human, they have to flip their attention switch consciously.  As a result, simply paying attention to me is a chore.  It requires effort.  I can come off as irritating because of the work it takes to attend to me.  I'm like the crash of a dropped plate in a busy restaurant.  People might notice it, but they aren't likely to stand up and start looking for the plate.  They notice the sound and then they continue attending to things which promise more reward.  

I don't trigger the investment switch either.  The investment switch is what makes you consider helping someone.  It's also what makes you care whether your attempts to help have been effective.  When I ask for help, what flips instead is more likely to be the threat switch, if indeed any switch is flipped at all.  As I've said before, I'm like an allergen to human attention.  Humans' natural response to me is rejection, often with prejudice.

It is this fundamental incompatibility with and my essential dissimilarity to humans that makes me feel that I'm not one of them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

The Meadow

 There is a cascade of questions: how can I live a good life? What is the value of goodness? What is the essence of value? We might assess our lives as either good or bad. We might say that good is better than bad, and that we should be good because being bad is the only alternative. But surely being neither good nor bad is an option. It must be possible to observe without assessing. This is what I want. I want to leave nothing in the world. Some will say that neutrality is simply in the bad category, and that we must want to live positive lives.  Let them say so, and let them condemn me if I live a life of non-participation. I have no interest in politics or society. I have no interest in justice or the common good. To some, saying this is the same as saying that I'm bad or that I'm at best contributing to the bad. Is appeasing critics to be my sole motivation for engaging with this evaluating system? Perhaps I should want to make the world better. But I don't believe ...