Skip to main content

The Wall of Crossed Arms

Socializing is a game.  If you want to integrate, you have to play it well.  People who are naturally good at the game might not ever realize they're playing it.  The game is ritual, posturing, and pandering.  It's competitive, like every human system.  Every move occurs on a razor's edge.  The penalty for bad play is exile.  If you opt not to play at all, you become invisible.  This game is going on all the time.  Everyone you meet is playing it, even people who think themselves especially welcoming.  Genuine care is earned on the merits of one's performance of normalcy; there's no haven wherein it's given freely. 

In an ideal world, anyone would be welcome anywhere.  Care wouldn't be measured and controlled.  If you wanted to float an idea or to participate in a conversation, you'd only need to speak your mind and you'd find everyone listening.  But this ideal world would have no humans in it.

Humans have to play this game.  There's seldom malice here; this is the only game in town.  Incidents of genuine altruism comprise the exception that proves the rule: human social systems aren't naturally equitable.  Equity is anathema to humans.  The socializing game pushes those with disintegrative problems to the fringes.  That's the point of the game, in fact.  From a Darwinian perspective, individuals with problems integrating might engage in anti-social behavior.  It makes sense to marginalize bad integrators because there might be something wrong with them.  They might be dangerous.  I can accept that.

I'm not integrated.  My natural affect marks me for exclusion in every situation.  I can't play the game.  I don't identify with my society's norms, and I never have.  Accordingly, I'm marginalized.  I have no standing or agency anywhere.  But I'm not a bad actor.  I'm forced out by a system that is meant to block people who may harm society, but I'm not such a threat.  The system is simply imperfect.  It's not meant to be perfect.  It's a filter.  Sometimes, harmless things get caught in it, but it's worth that price to stop harmful things.  So, I'm on the outside.  I can't get help, and I can't arouse care about my predicament in anyone.  Even people who have jobs that require them to care can't help but look at me as an inconvenience.  The world before me is like a wall of crossed arms, disapproving people judging my dysfunctional social acumen, protecting their concern the way a predator protects its prey from scavengers. 

I'm mixing metaphors here trying to describe total social disintegration.  Every door is closed to me.  That isn't hyperbole.  I'm dismissed out of hand in every situation because I'm fatally different.  I'm a complete social failure.  There are millions like me, but we don't appear to exist.  We're outside all concern.  We're even estranged from each other by virtue of our social dysfunction.  We have no banner.  It's a painful existence.  I want this to be a matter of record, even if nobody cares.  I want to show the kinds of academics that study minds, behavior, society, and consciousness that there is a whole suffering stratum of people who aren't welcome anywhere.  I don't know what change can happen, but someone should see us.  Someone on the inside should know, finally, what it's like to be a constant outsider.  I want to disabuse people of the frankly risable notion that everyone will find acceptance somewhere.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Man Is Not Great: The Evolution of Anthropocentrism

Why do humans care whether their species is special? Why are they so invested in their specialness that they're uncomfortable with the idea that they aren't? Why is it a bitter pill to swallow that humans aren't uniquely important in the universe, that they aren't the intended end of evolution, and that their wondrous and diverse subjective experiences emerge from the same physical processes observable in "lower" animals? I think that the maladaptive human tendency to insist upon their specialness in the universe is an extension of an adaptive tendency to self-advocate in their tribes. Consider fear. The predisposition to turn around when you feel like something might be behind you is likely to save you when there really is something there. Most of the time, when you can't help but turn around on the dark basement steps, there's no threat. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s better to turn unnecessarily than to do nothing in a moment of danger. That...

The Mystery of Friendship

Friendship looks good on paper.  People appear to enjoy their friendships and to want, or at least to expect, to have friends.  I don't have this experience.  I don't want friends. It took me a long time to understand that I have no desire for friendship.  As a child I thought I had to seek friendships because everyone around me wanted them.  It was part of trying to pass; I know that now but I didn't then.  I wasn't aware that other people didn't have to try to be like each other.  How could I have been?  I had no basis for comparison besides myself so I assumed everyone was like me.  I thought I was neurotypical and this was conducive to my feelings of inferiority.  I didn't know why I was so bad at being like everyone else.  It was because they were being themselves and I wasn't.  But I wouldn't realize that until long after my formative years were over. I was a very confused child.  I had few friendships and I wasn...

The Meadow

 There is a cascade of questions: how can I live a good life? What is the value of goodness? What is the essence of value? We might assess our lives as either good or bad. We might say that good is better than bad, and that we should be good because being bad is the only alternative. But surely being neither good nor bad is an option. It must be possible to observe without assessing. This is what I want. I want to leave nothing in the world. Some will say that neutrality is simply in the bad category, and that we must want to live positive lives.  Let them say so, and let them condemn me if I live a life of non-participation. I have no interest in politics or society. I have no interest in justice or the common good. To some, saying this is the same as saying that I'm bad or that I'm at best contributing to the bad. Is appeasing critics to be my sole motivation for engaging with this evaluating system? Perhaps I should want to make the world better. But I don't believe ...